12/23/2005

Testing Performancing

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

Update:
the automatic Technorati tags didn't work. I'll have to look into that some more...

performancing blog editorI am testing out Performancing, which just released a blog editor / firefox extension (found through Steven Cohen over at Library Stuff). It's pretty cool! Take a look at it in the first image - that's me starting this blog post.

As you can see, it's got a WYSIWYG interface, with all the usual bold, italic, underlined, and add links goodness. It also has the ability to mess with the HTML code (which I just did to make the image on the left align left and have no icky border).

But the coolest thing (also seen in the first image) is the split screen, RIGHT ON THE FIREFOX BROWSER. How neat is that?

performancingOK - so you think it's cool too, and want to post using it. What do you do? Take a look at this next image - there are a number of different ways to open it up (and I'm still just experimenting). You can toggle the split screen on and off using the F8 key; if you right-click, you'll see Performancing on the menu (circled in the image to the right); or you can click the little notepad-and-pencil icon in the bottom right-hand cormer of the Firefox window (also circled). Wow!

Even cooler - and I don't know if this is going to really work yet or not - is the ability to automatically add Technorati tags to my blog posts. Yep, that's what the Performancing folks claim... so we'll see once I hit the Publish button.

So here goes - I'm going to publish this little gem right now...

performancing - added manually

12/16/2005

David's Current 2006 Speaking Schedule

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

Update...


January 24: Library Web Site meets About.com, webcast for The Education Institute

Febuary 1: Introduction to Search Engines, KCMLIN

March 1: Blogs, Wikis, and Emerging Trends - Web 2.0, KCMLIN

March 22: The Basics of Web-Based Experience Planning, Computers in Libraries 2006

April 24, into June: Basics of Library Website Management, 6 week online course for The Education Institute

April 29: Remembering our Past: Creating the Kansas City History Database, Midwest Archives Conference (MAC)

12/15/2005

Building a Cool Children's Website

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

My library is in the process of planning a new, hip children's website... and I thought some of you might find our plans interesting. So - go check out our Request for Quotation (RFQ) that I posted today.

We think there's some pretty cool stuff there for kids - I'd love to hear what others think!

12/14/2005

ALA and Speaking

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

Jenny Levine posted her experiences with speaking at ALA and PLA. I've had two similar experiences:

1. Spoke at ALA, wasn't a member. Luckily, my library paid my way, so I had airfare and hotel funding. But ALA was terribly strict about my non-member status - I could only attend the exhibit hall for one day (and couldn't go to any other program that day).

2. Invited to speak at PLA, wasn't a member. Library couldn't fund... ALA/PLA didn't want to fund... I didn't speak.

If that's not bad enough, I know of at least one state library association who does the same thing. Why on earth do they do this? "Well... that's what ALA does..."

ALA - you are supposed to be a shining example of how to do IT right (whatever IT might be). Other associations look to you for guidance. Please - DO IT RIGHT. Conference speakers are INTEGRAL to a conference. At $130 - 235 a person for registration * 20,00 attendees... plus 900 exhibitors * however much you charge them for booths... I'd think you'd be able to AT LEAST waive the conference fee.

At least.

12/12/2005

Book Publisher Looking to the Future

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

Update to the update: never mind - I figured it out.


Update: for some odd reason, I can't seem to make a direct link to the blog post... the link to the actual blog is below - anyone know the direct link? Thanks!

I thought this was cool: Working Smart: The Death of Traditional Book Publishing.

Michael Hyatt is the CEO of Thomas nelson Publishers, a large christian publishing house. He has an interesting blog (frequently discusses GTD stuff, for those GTD fans). But this post is discussing the future of the paper book. Here's a wonderful quote:

"While most publishers will admit that reference content is better accessed on the computer, almost all believe that the traditional non-fiction book or novel will never be replaced with a digital equivalent. I say, “baloney.” "

It's nice to see a forward-thinking CEO of a publishing house! He goes even further, and provides his ideal device - here are a few of his ideas:

- It looks similar to a tablet PC slate. No keyboard, no monitor, and it folds in half.
- It is the same size and thickness as a hardcover book, say 6" by 9" by 1/2". Unfolded, it is 12" x 9" by 1/4". It feels great in your lap. It can even be bent slightly like a book, so you can curl up on the sofa and read away.
- It uses a tablet PC interface with a built-in stylus that feels like a high-end pen. You can use it to make menu selections, enter text (via handwriting recognition), or highlight passages in books.
- It has a battery life of 12–18 hours.
- It completely replaces your computer and runs all your favorite applications.
- It has 256 gigabytes of flash drive storage. It has room for tens of thousands of songs, photos, movies—and books. Because it has no moving parts (unlike a hard drive), it is faster and more reliable.
- It includes a software application similar to iTunes for the purchase and download of books. Heck, maybe it's just a modification of iTunes.
- It has a docking station that allows you to use a keyboard, mouse, external monitor, etc.
- It runs an Apple operating system. (obviously, he's a Mac fan, too)

This isn't really that far away from reality - combine the iPod Nano and some type of e-paper that's being tested now, and you pretty much have what Hyatt is discussing.

So check out the post, and see what happens in the next few years. if publishing houses are talking like this, they're preparing for change (hmm... that sounds familiar...). We should be, too.

12/09/2005

Yahoo buys del.icio.us

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

Wow. Double wow. del.icio.us: y.ah.oo!

Yahoo now owns two of the hottest sites on the planet - del.icio.us and flickr.

2006 should be an extremely interesting year!

yahoo del.icio.us web2.0

Reading OCLC's Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2005), Parts 3, 4, 5, and Conclusion

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

More notes while reading through Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2005).

Part 3: The Library Brand:

The one thing that stood out to me is the top three criteria respondents use for deciding which electronic information source to use: 1. provides worthwhile information; 2. Provides free information; and 3. Based on ease of use.

I think we get #'s 1 and 2 right - but not always #3.

Part 4: Respondents' Advice to Libraries:

and

Part 5: Libraries--A "Universal" Brand?:

Good stuff, but nothing that stands out to me...

Conclusion:

84% of respondents use search engines to begin an information search ... 1% begin the search on a library website. That makes perfect sense - we currently don't have too much actual information residing on our websites.

What do we have? We have pointers to information - pointers to the catalog, to databases, to other websites. More Subject Guides and original articles focusing on how to find niche information is a good way to start bridging this gap. Focused guides and articles will also put those parts of our website in a search engine's hit lists.

"Library card holders use information resources more than non-card holders, and they are more
favorably disposed to libraries than non-card holders." OK - this is one of those silly parts ... really, did this need to be studied? This is like doing a study on exercise to see if it really does help you lose weight... just a little pet peave of mine...

Big flags should go up here:
1. "Information consumers use the library. They use the library less and read less since they began using the Internet."
2. "Borrowing print books is the library service most used."

Big issue - Customers are borrowing our print books less, but that's our primary commodity. This needs to change. Period.

Little issue, to OCLC - I think you mean respondents are reading PRINT BOOKS less, rather than reading less. If they are using the Internet, most likely they are still reading - just not a print book.

"Find ways to get material to people, rather than making them come to the library." - again, the theme of going out and meeting your customers....

12/08/2005

Reading OCLC's Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2005), Parts 1 and 2

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

I'm reading OCLC's Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2005) . I highly recommend reading this! Here are a collection of quotes, numbers, my thoughts, etc. - taken as I'm reading. Hope you find it useful.

Introduction:

"Users are not aware of the electronic resources libraries make freely available." Wow. Many libraries hide them under the phrase "library databases" - what's that mean? Some of us try to bring them out a little more, by calling them Magazines, Newspapers, and More" or "Find articles." But of course, that only works for people who visit your library (in person or digitally).

We need to be meeting our customers in the community, with databases in hand. Visit schools - do an in-service. How about chamber of commerce brown bag style presentations? How about inviting yourself to a business meeting?

Part 1: Libraries and Information Sources--Use, Familiarity and Favorability:

Over 80 % of 14-24 year olds have a library card, but most (73%) visit at least once a year. Re-read that statistic this way: 73% of our future adult patrons visit us about once a year. Yikes.

Double wow - most customers use email, search engines, and IM. But what do libraries provide? Access to all these (although I have been to libraries that restrict both email and IM). But how about training? Probably search engine training, possibly training in setting up an email account - but certainly no IM training.

Triple wow - "In the 12 years that search engines have been in existence, they have achieved a familiarity rating that is slightly higher than that of physical libraries and considerably higher than that of online libraries." But - libraries have been around for centuries, for pete's sake! Tell me - who's marketing correctly, and who's providing a service that people want?

A quote from an individual - "I despise searching the library for books and other sources. It takes a long time and rarely can you find sources needed. This difficult process is the first thing I think of when I think of using the library" (from an 18 year old). Ouch. OK - to be fair, there are good quotes, too.

Part 2: Using the Library--In Person and Online:

"Respondents feel that the local bookstore is more a suitable source of current materials than their library." I've seen a small flurry of staff emails today working on that very problem. Bookstores know in advance that certain books will probably be hot, when new movies are out, etc. We, as "Information Specialists," SHOULD be able to find and use that same information. Why aren't we?

Again, "Awareness of electronic databases and electronic materials at the library is low. Awareness of library Web sites and online library catalogs is high." We're obviously doing a good job of leading customers to our library catalog, but not to our databases.

"Most respondents do not seek assistance when using library electronic resources." Which is why we need to get out from behind the service desk - the idea of roving reference is a great one.

Reasons for never using the library website:
1. didn't know it existed - We need to put the library's URL EVERYWHERE. But just for starters - that's passive pushing. Active pushing would be sending actual library staff out of the library, doing presentations in the community. Placing ads in the gaming stores around town. Sponsoring a poetry reading at a coffee shop. Etc. etc. etc.
2. Other Web sites have better information - Wow - that's very true. Think about it - They're really comparing one measly website (the library website) with billions of websites (via google). Who's going to win? But that's ok. We can't be everything... but we can be the best at some things, like local information. Our library websites can be the first and the best stop for information about our communities.
3. can't find the Web site - Refer to my thought on #1 above...

More later...

SJCPL's Subject Guide Wiki

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

Michael and Maire posted about their library's awesome Subject Guide wiki. And awesome it is! It is easily accessible from their library's main page, and already has 17 subjects listed (last Friday there were three, so those librarians are busy!). And nowhere on the website is the word "Wiki" mentioned, which is great - the term would just confuse most patrons (and those who know what wikis are will recognize it as a wiki anyway).

Click on a Subject Guide, and you get a variety of info, depending on the Guide. For example, the Business Guide currently includes Company Information, Personal Finance Planning, Programs and Events, links, etc. And the best part? They get the whole Subject Guide thing - they're pointing to their content: linking to their databases, books, and events. They're even pointing to a few non-library events that are focused on the particular subject guide's topic - way cool.

Then the wiki part kicks in... each guide has a discussion section where customers can add comments to the guide - think instant feedback, content contributions, and a stronger sense of community. And - if you really want to - you can subscribe to the Recent Changes RSS feed (it's sorta hidden, and sorta techie-looking - but it IS a way to see what's being updated).

But that's just for patrons... what about staff? The nice thing about a wiki, of course, is the built-in ability to edit pages without having to know HTML, PHP, Ajax, or any number of nasty coding languages. You can just edit, update, and creat useful content. The wiki is set up for library staff to log in and edit (and no one else gets to), which is fine in this instance.

Visual design: It currently looks very much like a wiki - which works for SJCPL. Their website currently uses a white background with images to brighten things up, and so the wiki's white background and text blends in nicely. But I'm curious about how much can be changed, design-wise, with this wiki. I'd hate to go from my library's tan/brown colors to the default wiki white - that'd be sorta jarring to our customers.

Are there other libraries using wiki's for subject guides? Yes. Check out Ohio University Libraries Biz Wiki. And check out this great article on what librarians can do with a wiki, written by Meredith. So go - check out the wiki subject guides, read Meredith's article, then sit and think: will this help my library meet our goals? If so, go for it!

wiki

Why Library 2.0?

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

I'm seeing lots of posts about the concept of Library 2.0 - how it's about serving our customers, how it's not about technology, etc. Interesting stuff. However - that part about Library 2.0 not really being about technology? Yes and no.

No: Technology is really just one of many tools to get at the heart of library 2.0, which is CHANGE. Libraries haven't really changed for A LONG TIME. And now we are changing in a big way. Our missions have changed, our collection development policies have changed, our staffing has changed, our primary services are changing, the formats of materials that we own and loan - changing.

We're now visited internally, externally, digitally. Visited in person, via IM, cell phone, chat, or email. We count web visits and door counts...

Yes: Read the above No section again and tell me what part DOESN'T focus in some way on technology. Go on. Tell me. OK - I'll help you out a little. This isn't in the last section, but the general concepts of:
  1. constant change in libraries
  2. participation, sharing, and thinking outside the box

Those are the non-techie Library 2.0 concepts. Now - why are all these changes taking place? Hmm? Because of technology.

  • All the web 2.0 services out right now = technology
  • the creation and distribution of original content rather than being an information silo = technology
  • New services mentioned above = technology (ie., chat, IM, web access, gaming, etc)
  • New material formats mentioned above = technology (ie., digital audio, streaming media, digitized collections, even CDs and DVDs)
  • Even new ways to do traditional services, like reference = technology (virtual chat, IM, even patrons calling in via cell phones)

Of course Library 2.0 is all about technology. But not technology for technology's sake. Not technology like silly, archaic, doesn't-really-make-sense-to-anyone-outside-the-library-world automation systems. The technology I'm talking about goes back to the concept of meeting your customers where they already are. Our patrons are using web 2.0 services. They are using cell phones. They are gaming, IM'ing, chatting. they are consuming digital content. And we as libraries need to be there, if we want to meet and greet our patrons.

Library 2.0 Web 2.0

12/06/2005

Job openings at Kansas City Public Library

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

Anyone want to work in my department? We have three job searches going on at the moment:

1. Web Developer - working on our hip website
2. Consortium Librarian - Helping to grow and market our library technology consortium
3. KCResearch Librarian - grant-funded 2-year position, helping to build a content repository focused on Kansas City - based research

We actually have other jobs open right now, too - check em out!

12/01/2005

Interesting Amazon Tags

**********************************************************

update:
Looking for me? Go to http://www.davidleeking.com

**********************************************************

Some of you probably know that amazon.com has started offering a version of tagging. I'm getting a kick out of some of the tags! Let me show you two examples:

Example 1, from The Hobbit:

Amazon Hobbit Tags

Example 2, from Nintendo's Game Boy Advance:

Amazon Gameboy Tags

See the difference? The Hobbit taggers are supplying tags that "seem normal" - tolkien, fiction, etc. But the Game Boy taggers... to be fair, there are some tags that I'd consider "normal tags" - like "game boy stuff" and "electronic game system." But take a peek at the other tags... Christian, Samay, Emily, Austin, etc... My guess? Kid's names. How about the "First tag" listing - Logan. I'll bet he's one proud kid!

The problem? None, really... that's how tagging works - you have the ability to add ANYTHING YOU WANT to an item. And I think it's cool that kids are getting into tagging, even if they're doing the digital equivalent of scratching their names on park benches. At least they are getting used to tagging!

web2.0 amazon tags folksonomy